Raising Good Cyber-Citizens: Online Safety for Parents & Kids

Should schools start including creepy internet lurker person in this?

This week, I was invited to be a guest of AT&T to the Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI) Annual Conference in DC.  After a day of discussions on topics from raising good cyber-citizens to the importance of parental involvement in keeping kids safe online and teaching them proper online behavior, to setting boundaries with kids and their time spent with technology, I left feeling more prepared and a little more paranoid about the dangers lurking behind the screen for my girls.

I could easily spend weeks on the range of topics covered just in the one day but after some time processing, I’ve decided to focus on: raising good cyber-citizens, teaching kids that parental involvement in their online activities is not the same as parental monitoring, and some safety tools I learned about that are there to make our lives as parents easier.

Raising Good Cyber-Citizens

My eldest just started Kindergarten in September and I will admit, I was a little surprised when she started coming home with sheets from McGruff, our favorite crime-fighting dog, teaching her to stay away from drugs, alcohol and needles. My initial reaction was it seemed a little young. But what I now am wondering is, where is the talk about online safety and modeling good behavior when they are on the computer; that their online behavior should mirror the way we expect them to behave in the classroom or the park? It almost seems dated to keep seeing these McGruff papers without any reference to computers and strangers online, doesn’t it?

The challenge facing educators across the country with integrating online safety and responsibility into their classroom was raised several times at the FOSI conference. Dave Miles of FOSI showed us a fascinating 4-minute video loaded with startling facts about kids and their online behaviors, both in the US and globally, and one fact noted that only 24% of teachers feel they are “very well prepared” to teach about protecting personal information on the internet. Contrast this figure with the fact that almost 50% of children can access the internet in their bedroom yet 60% of parents don’t use parental controls because they think they aren’t necessary when rules are in place. One must really question the  naive implicit trust of parents to think they don’t need to go a few extra steps beyond just establishing internet rules. Or instead of trust, is it laziness, or is it just lack of awareness?

Watching the video, what was particularly unsettling to me was the figures noting the percentages of girls, specifically, who reveal their ages freely online and share their passwords with others. Sure, they are 16 and want to tell the world they can now drive. But again, is it worth it?  Are we communicating enough with our kids that the lines between private and public are so severely blurred anymore that they must always be aware of  the consequences of over-sharing online?

During Miles’ speech, he notably emphasized that children aren’t processing the concept of anonymity online. He explained that while children fundamentally come to understand the importance of not getting into cars with strangers but when they are placed in front of this “amorphous, cloud like space” – the internet – their ability to appreciate that their actions are not anonymous and have consequences is much less appreciated. It takes work and time for them to come to understand they are not, in fact, ever anonymous online.

So what can we do? A common thread throughout the day was the importance of parents taking active, constant roles in engaging their kids in conversations about what they do online, how they act, what they see, and how they talk about people online. These discussions need to start early and continue. And teachers and schools must also support this dialogue.  Frederick Lane, keynote speaker at FOSI and author of “Cybertraps for the Young,” emphasized the reality that homework is not just for kids anymore, that parents must stay adept and current with the burgeoning technology and apps at our kids’ disposal. The poignant example he offered was on the photo sharing sites that kids are eager to use. While researching for his book, he found that parents were stunned to learn that when a child uploads a picture of themself on a photo sharing site, it can at once be shared with over 200 photo sharing sites globally, with just one click of a button. Do we want our children to be globally distributing pictures of themselves? Are we fully aware of the consequences of their seamless and eager ability to navigate the web? Are our children aware beyond the initial satisfaction they glean from sharing their picture with their “friends?”

Finally, there were several interesting discussions on cyber-bullying and sexting. One comment that really struck me that ties into the importance of both schools and parents working together to help teach our children to be good, responsible and safe “cyber-citizens,” was about the issue of sexting. It was made by Frederick Lane during his keynote address. He discussed that the cyber-ethical behavior of adults and the media is critical in modeling good cyber-citizenship behavior for kids and remarked that the cases of Vanessa Hutchins, Hannah Montana, Ashton Kutcher and even the Anthony Weiner drama were all couched in a “ha ha – isn’t it funny” framework. When we react this way, we are teaching our kids that sexting is okay, sometimes funny, instead of reprehensible and against the law. He then offered that if kids receive sex education in school, have we considered incorporating “sext education” into that curriculum. I thought it was a great question and certainly one I hadn’t considered because my kids are still so young.

Parental Involvement or Parental Monitoring?

The lines between engaging kids in conversations about good online behavior and then blatantly spying on them was a grey area to me prior to the FOSI Conference. Again, I say this as a parent with a 6-and 3-year-old, so difficult scenarios and questions haven’t yet been raised in my own house but I have given it much consideration. I’ve always believed that unless children know that their parents fundamentally trust them, then how can we expect them to actually make good decisions? Philosophically, I hover somewhere between free range parenting and flirting with helicopter parenting on any given day. As kids, my parents gave me and my sisters a considerable amount of freedom and it showed us that they trusted us and in return, most of the time, we weren’t inclined to violate that trust. It also gave me a certain confidence in myself that I believe has served me well so far in life. So when I hear of parents having all their 10-year-olds emails sent to their account so they can read them, I have almost a visceral reaction to that. And then I listened to Frederick Lane’s keynote address at FOSI. He said that it’s flawed logic to think of online safety as spying on your kids, instead he framed it as parental involvement, not parental monitoring. He referenced his own 16-year-old son, who he said is a burgeoning civil rights attorney, and he confidently noted “he doesn’t have an unfettered right to privacy because he’s not an adult.”

That statement really struck a chord with me, as well as the argument that parental involvement is not spying. It’s reality. Parents need to be involved and engaged in the online activities and behaviors of their kids. Several people beyond Frederick Lane addressed this topic, including during one of the break-out sessions, and it’s clear that like everything else in parenthood, there is a wide spectrum of approaches to parental involvement. Having my kids’ emails forwarded to me still doesn’t sit right with me. But not allowing computers in their bedrooms and establishing a family rule that cell phones get placed in my bedroom by 8pm every night to be charged – is the kind of parental involvement that I fully intend to execute.

Safety Tools

So what safety tools are available to parents to help us keep our kids safe and raise good cyber-citizens? To be involved but not spy? It’s your lucky day because I learned about some fabulous and free programs – as well as some other tools. First up, Common Sense Media and AT&T joined forces to bring parents safety tools and family friendly content ratings for mobile apps, video games and more.  AT&T represenatives explained that their research is showing that among their 100 million wireless customers, the families and parents are all looking for ways to cut through the clutter and really utilize helpful tools to keep their kids safe, especially now that more than half of all children have access to smartphones and tablet devices at home. Looking forward, Common Sense Media and AT&T will collaborate to incorporate Common Sense reviews and ratings into AT&T services.

Until then, parents can download the free Common Sense App to get up-to-date reviews, ratings and recommendations tailored to the child’s age. I was unaware of this App and immediately poked around online to learn more about it. After reading this glowing review,  I downloaded the free app and immediately became obsessed. You can enter the age of your child and select what sorts of reviews you are looking for: games, books, movies, music and more – and in a blink of an eye, you are offered a host of options to scroll through with ratings for educational purpose, violence, even consumerism messaging. The app offers book and gift suggestions – so it’s not only useful for parents but also family  members who might be looking for gift ideas for grandkids, nieces, nephews, etc.

AT&T has also launched a Smart Controls site where parents can download parental controls onto smart phones, manage the privacy settings of the FamilyMap and help avoid viruses. The site is also a great resource to find helpful websites and up-to-date resources on the latest safety issues facing families today.

In addition to these resources, Leticia, author of TechSavvy Mama and local DC mom, was a panelist in one of the break-out sessions and she noted that Safely is a preferred resource for her family for Facebook monitoring. I also had a chance to speak with the Safely reps at their booth at the FOSI conference and intend to utilize their service when the time comes in my house. Leticia noted that Safely isn’t used as a spying tool but it is a free service that compiles a report to show parents what their child’s behavior is like on Facebook through weekly reports. You can also monitor the average ages of their “friends” on Facebook and one of the Safely reps explained that coming in the future will be a new tool that can detect the tone your child is using on Facebook – to alert  you of aggressive behavior.

Finally, Google reps had a very informative booth at the conference — little did I know with one easy step – you can turn on parental controls to filter out unwanted content from Google searches or YouTube videos (click those links to learn how easily and quickly you can activate the privacy settings).

Conclusion

Online Safety and raising good cyber-citizens requires constant communication on the part of parents, it also requires that parents spend the time to stay current on technology, games, apps and whatever else continues becomes hot online as our kids get older. I appreciated hearing from a few speakers that despite the doom and gloom and creepy strangers lurking online, the reality is that technology opens a world of possibility and opportunities to our kids.

Disclosure: AT&T invited me as their guest to attend the FOSI conference and compensated me for my time and writing about my experience. My analysis of the day I spent at FOSI is my own analysis.

Getting back your “Pre-Baby Body”

“Wow, you look great,” I gushed. “I can’t believe you just had a baby a few weeks ago!”

Why was I saying this, I wondered. Could I possibly have forgotten how much I loathed the public commentary on the growing size of my pregnant body and then the post-delivery comments, or worse, lack of comments, on how I was getting rid of the baby weight. The lack of comments was almost worse than the forced declarations of how great I looked because no comment, in my mind, only affirmed what I knew but hoped I was able to cleverly disguise, which was that I wasn’t looking quite like Heidi Klum yet.

This woman, to whom I was gushing like an idiot, cut me off and said “I should tell you, I used a surrogate.”

That shut me up. And note – I just met her that minute – so who was I to even comment on her post-baby body.

But we do it. We all do it. Even if we don’t all stick our foot in our mouth and sound like idiots. And we do it because,  like it or not, we are a culture that praises thinness. We view extra weight as a sign of laziness and “giving up” and we applaud women who shrink back to their pre-baby bodies in weeks. They get magazine covers and TV attention. They are talked about online. We hate them but we still watch them. How often does anyone talk about the fact that spending all those hours in the gym to lose the baby weight means all those hours aren’t being spent by the mother with the new baby?  Or about what the potential damage is on a postpartum body to exercise so vigorously or eat so restrictively? Can we hear more about that instead?

And yet, setting logic aside, if you’ve had a baby, you know just how rotten it feels to discover it actually takes a really long time and a lot of hard work and energy to lose that baby weight. And did anyone warn you that you were going to be short on time AND energy as soon as you  have a baby? I didn’t feel sufficiently warned that first time, as I shoved crackers and chocolate into my mouth throughout the pregnancy.

Even though my youngest is now almost 3 and I am anxious to give-away all my maternity clothes and baby gear, I am always interested in reading articles about women’s body images post-babies, so I was delighted to stumble upon an article in the Australian media called “Ignore the hype, real women don’t ‘bounce back’ to their pre-pregnant shape.”

I almost didn’t need to read any more. I just wanted to shout “OH HELL YES”

“SAY IT AGAIN”

“SHOUT IT LOUDER, SISTER”

Should I keep going? Do you feel me?

Miranda Kerr Pregnant and then with a 4-month-old...VOMIT

It’s because of jerks  celebrities like Miranda Kerr on the runway a few months after giving birth, that I felt horrible when I was still putting on maternity clothes 8 weeks after having a baby, and when I was shoving myself into my suits like a sausage, 12 weeks post-partum. It is so defeating and it is not a time in a woman’s life when she needs something else to make her feel defeated. I think we can all agree that the baby does a good job of that.

The findings from the land down under fascinated me. The author studied how the Australian media idealizes the pregnant woman by focusing on celebrities, sound familiar? I think we can all agree that phenomenon is hardly unique to Australia. Though Nicole Kidman’s miraculous shrinking body days after the delivery of her first child was even fast by celebrity standards.

The writers of the piece found the subtext was that women should prioritize regaining their pre-baby bodies “with the same effort they would employ when recovering from an illness.” And not shockingly, the incessant praise heaped upon celebrities for “bouncing back” so quickly perpetuates this idea that we all can do so, if we just tried a little harder and had some discipline.

Because, again, we aren’t trying hard enough to just keep a baby alive and catch a few Zzzs along the way.

The other insightful finding was this chatter on the benefits of breastfeeding for losing weight – and I find that’s very common here – Angelina Jolie loved to tout how nursing helped her regain her pre-baby body. The Australian piece links to a recent study finding that breastfeeding may not promote weight loss.

I can tell you that for me, breastfeeding promoted EATING. Never in my life was I ever as hungry as when I nursed. I never knew such hunger. Add that kind of hunger to a sleep-deprived and hormonal mind and body, and I wouldn’t dare say no to chocolate or chips or ice cream. I DESERVED IT.

Needless to say, nursing didn’t do a thing for me and my elusive enemy, weight loss.

Though dated now, the old Girlfriends Guide to Pregnancy book series notes 9 months up, 9 months down…and while it took me a bit longer than 9 months to go down, that seems like a much healthier approach than idolizing celebrities who hide their personal chefs and trainers behind the scenes, and very publicly return to their pre-baby weight in a matter of weeks. Liv Tyler is one of the few celebs I can think of who took a while longer to return to her thin self and frankly, it was refreshing to see. It actually made me like her a lot more because I felt I could relate. She seemed normal and not super human.

Now about that pre-baby body, I’d like to add my own argument into this discussion (cause I haven’t done that enough already). Just the idea of getting our “pre-baby bodies” back is mis-leading.

BECAUSE THE BABY CHANGES THE BODY.

So why do we keep talking like they don’t?

Are you with me? Doesn’t the media praise heaped upon celebs for achieving what almost no one else can – hitting the runway weeks or a few short months later – erode our own perceptions of what is healthy? Furthermore it dilutes what is really praise-worthy, which is the miracle that is pregnancy and the gift of a healthy baby; it shouldn’t matter what we look like and worrying about getting our “pre-baby bodies back” should be the last thing entering a new mom’s mind. Unfortunately, all too often, it’s at the top of the list.

Not sure what we can do about it beyond committing to not buying the magazines that heap this praise when it’s happening? Thoughts?

“Like” the Wired Momma Facebook page…I totally give away the secrets on how to lose all that baby weight on there…

Kim Kardashian Divorce – Egg on Face of E! Entertainment

Here’s the thing, on this one, I’d be lying if I said I hate to say I told you so. So I won’t. Because any one of us could have made a mint off placing a bet that the Kim Kardashian disgrace, sham of a wedding, would swiftly end in divorce.

How shocking it's over....Photo Credit: Albert Michael/startraksphoto.com

Way back on August 29, I mouthed off against the repulsive excess that was her wedding, the shame the execs at E! Entertainment (I mistakenly thought this stupid special aired on Bravo, so I was trashing NBC Universal unfairly yesterday) should feel for spending upwards of $20 million on the rights for her wedding, when so many people are jobless and homeless in this country. More to the point, for reasons that escape me (and notably President Obama) entirely, young girls, in particular, care about the Kardashian sisters. They watch them and unfortunately they are learning things like money and body equate to happiness and success, marriages can be bought and you can resolve difficult times by walking away instead of putting in some hard work. Kim, in particular, has become famous for not much more than her body, from what  I can tell, and within the past two weeks Matt Laurer was swooning over her, asking her for marital bliss insights, on the Today Show. Clearly all in an effort to further promote the Kardashian wedding special airing that weekend.

Meanwhile, Kim answered the questions, playing the coy blissful bride, while the ink was probably wet on her divorce papers.

It was so obvious to me that her sham marriage to make money would end soon after the wedding special aired in October but even cynical me didn’t think it would end a mere 2 weeks later. Kim – ratings whore – you could have at least celebrated your first holiday season as a blushing bride. Think of the ratings during the November sweeps month, people would have tuned in to watch you fumble over making something in the kitchen for your new groom, or to see what you were wearing for your first Christmas as a married couple. Frankly, I’m amazed money-hungry-ratings-whoring Kim didn’t realize what a missed opportunity that was to just prolong her sham marriage. Shots of her acting like a vixen version of Betty Crocker would have been a sweeps hit.

But let’s be serious for a minute. The idea of paying someone to get married for a ratings win, particularly someone who has enormous influence on young girls, during a deep and prolonged recession, is disgraceful. The corporate attorneys should have at least been savvy enough to anticipate the PR disgrace that would follow a $20 million wedding special ending in divorce in the same month and written into the contract that they must remain married at least through the end of the year. This “marriage” ended after 72 days.

So if Mrs. Obama recently said she doesn’t mind her girls watching the Kardashian show on E! so long as they learn something from it, then hopefully what we’re all learning is that if our girls are watching this garbage on TV, they should learn that giving up on marriage isn’t an option after 72 days, that marrying for reasons other than love isn’t ever a good idea, and just because you’re on TV doesn’t mean you are worthy of being there. And to the executives who egregiously agreed to pay her to get married, I said it back in August and I’ll say it again now, I hope you’re fired and then forced to give the equivalent amount to charities around this country that support the people who actually need the money.

Take the candy out of your mouth…..

And put it away.

If you are anything like moi, and apparently 90% of us do this, we eat our kids Halloween candy. Who are the 10% who claim they don’t do this? They annoy me. And are probably lying.

On top of eating our kids candy, odds are many of you have a kid who can’t handle the sugar rush. I  know I do. I DREAD Halloween and the candy overload. I still haven’t purchased any Halloween candy because I cannot control myself. I will tell myself it’s just for the kids. And I’ll hide it so my husband can’t pig out. But then I hear it, the candy calls to me, its voice grows louder and louder the longer it sits behind a closed closet door, hidden under some other mess, mocking me, reminding me of its contents and how good it tastes going down.  Some of the candy shouts louder than others, beckoning me to just try a small taste. And god forbid I have the slightest will power. Because I don’t.

“I’ll just take one to satiate my chocolate craving,” I tell myself. “I deserve it after the (insert anything here) these kids have done to me today,” I reason. Doesn’t that sound so convincing?

I am a liar. Who do I think I am kidding when I say I will stop after one. And if you do that, just stop reading my blog. We don’t have anything in common…

After 5 or 6 I wonder if I have a problem. I particularly love a good Almond Joy. That mix of chocolate and coconut. Mmmm….mmm……

The year I was 36 weeks pregnant with our second, I bought only pretzels and play-doh to avoid the unnecessary calories on the body that already tipped too high of a number of the scales and my husband said “Our house is going to get egged for this.”

I wondered if he was right.

So this year I will wait until this weekend to purchase my candy but in anticipation of what a huge pig I am, I will buy way more than we need. Let’s be honest, on All Hallows Eve, after the cherubs are nestled into their beds, I will ransack their goodie bags for my A list candy. When that pig fest is over, I will feel bad about myself and again wonder why I can’t just stop after one. But this year it WILL be different. I will take back the night because on November 1st, you know where all our candy is going? It’s going to Treats 4 Our Troops.

They need the treats way more than any of us!

Have you heard of this wonderful organization, founded by local Arlington mom of 4, Yael Israel Roggen? I was lucky enough to interview Yael earlier this week and learn more about T4OT, the non-profit she founded four years ago based on her own great idea. Yael had a friend who was deployed and used to send him care packages every month. Four years ago she decided to send him her extra Halloween candy. The year after that, more troops asked her for candy and she started volunteering with the Yellow Ribbon Fund at Walter Reed. She decided to put an email out to her preschool listserv and ended up with 300 pounds of candy to send to the troops. Clearly a brilliant idea was born. Yael said that she realized there as a need to fill here, donating candy to T4OT is a chance for members of a community to take what they already have – there is no reason to buy more – and send it to our troops.  In 2009, she collected 3,000 pounds of candy and last year, 5,000 pounds. It has spread to a nationwide effort and now takes her an entire year to have all the candy sent overseas to our troops.  Her non-profit has grown so much that Girl Scout Troops participate in packing efforts, schools in San Diego have hosted a packing effort, and locally the Corporate Executive Board has become the organization’s “Guardian Angel,” not only packaging candy but also paying for its shipment.

It’s shipping the candy overseas that is easy to forget, once we donate it to her; it still has to get to the troops and she is asking us not to open our pocket books to purchase candy, but if you want to open your wallets, to donate  money for shipment.

On top of this being a great teaching moment for our kids, Yael is encouraging people to get involved on Veteran’s Day, send letters to the troops, or

This pic says it all!

 participate in a packing event. The best place for information on how to get involved is on the T4oT Facebook page. Yael said that not only are many local schools, businesses and organizations getting involved, but so too are military families participating in collecting candy and writing letters to the troops. She noted that it’s really wonderful to see it coming full circle. I know I couldn’t agree more.

No matter if you live in DC, VA or MD, you can save your calories and donate to the troops very easily. Yael emailed this list of locations accepting candy donations for T4OT:

Patriot Harley Davidson Fairfax
Yellow Ribbon Fund Bethesda
Corporate Executive Board Rosslyn
Westover Market Arlington
Covet Arlington
The Habitat for Humanity ReStore Chantilly
Falls Church Properties Falls Church
ReMax Results Frederick
Tradition Homes McLean

There you have it – a fabulous way to give to our troops and keep your svelte figure at the same time. Yael is encouraging people to keep up with her Facebook page for new information because she has more time to update that than her web site -which is completely understandable. I hope you’ll join me in donating or contact Yael to set up a donation location as well. The more the merrier in this great cause..so please…spread the word…your super sexy body thanks you, and more importantly, so do the troops.

For more tips on keeping your figure svelte, or really just anything else I feel like blabbing about, be sure to “Like” the Wired Momma Facebook page….we have fun there…not just here…