Category Archives: Motherhood

Dad Talk

On Sunday we had brunch with a couple who have a 4 month old. We are friends through the husbands, they grew up together. Normally we get together with what I could consider “my friends” and the wives dominate the conversation.

Come to think of it, no matter who we get together with, let’s be honest, it seems the wives dominate the conversation.

Let’s face it, we’re more interesting and talkative, us women folk. Who wants to talk football when they can be talking fall fashion? Boots anyone? (sidebar: I FINALLY purchased a pair of low heeled chocolate brown boots and I am thrilled. I think they will do right by me this fall and winter, chasing after my toddler but looking cute and stylish along the way. Here’s the link if you’re curious:  http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/2923689/0~2376778~2372811~2376239~2376362~2376240?mediumthumbnail=Y&origin=category&searchtype=&pbo=2376240&P=1).

OK – so while the wives pretty much dominated with our fascinating thoughts again this past Sunday, the husbands also chimed in. And this was a first-time meeting of these two friends since both of them have become fathers.

And frankly, what I heard actually surprised me. There’s some new show on ABC that I haven’t watched and don’t intend to but the previews show Dylan McDermott (hot) sitting in a spa like situation with his male friends and he makes some comment “Men, we’re the new women.”

I’m guessing that’s the only funny one-liner for the entire series of the show but it amused me. And suddenly, over brunch on Sunday, I found myself thinking there was truth to that statement. 

My husband’s friend starting talking about how he is adjusting to the reality that he just doesn’t have time for anything anymore. For example, working out. He lamented how he just doesn’t have any extra time to get to the gym.

To which my husband responded in agreement, even sounding sympathetic, and went on to say “I know, it’s like I’m constantly racing around. I get up in the morning and we’re taking turns getting ready and playing with our daughter. Then I race out the door to get to work. Then I hurry through the day and just work so I can get out at a reasonable time. Then I race home and try to beat the traffic so I can get home and see her a little bit before she goes to bed. It’s non-stop.”

STOP THE PRESSES.

Hold up.

Was I hearing this right?

In case you are confused, allow me to remind you, this conversation was taking place between my husband and his buddy.

NOT between me and the wife.

I was blown away.

Here we are, coming on two years into this parenthood gig, and it just blew me away that all this time, my husband actually feels the same way that I do. I had no idea. He’s never expressed this rushed feeling meanwhile, dive into the archives of KT, or just read me once a week, and do you hear anything else? It’s a common theme. Race race race. The Amazing Race.  Hell, I have trouble slowing down for old ladies with walkers when I’m driving home from work. And don’t get me started on jaywalkers.

But this honest conversation between two dad’s was not only surprising to me, it made me feel ridiculous for not realizing it and it was just really cool to listen to the two of them banter on like a bunch of mom’s. 

Maybe Dad’s are the new women?

Monday Morning Perspective

So before I left this morning my nanny offered up some perspective on life. She started telling me how she babysat on Saturday for a three-year old little girl in my neighborhood. She said “she made me cry.”

Turns out the little girl cried a lot while my nanny was there because she misses her daddy.

Her daddy is a soldier in Iraq. She said she talked so much about her daddy and how much she misses him and how much she wants him to come home.

Then when she went to bed, she took a letter with her and held it in her little buyambienmed.com hands under her pillow, a letter from her daddy. My nanny said there were many other such letters under her pillow that she holds onto all night long.

Is there a dry eye anywhere in the room right now?

Honestly, it’s that kind of thing that just puts everything into perspective. I’m not sure how I can stop thinking about this little girl and how much she aches for her daddy before my mind even wanders to the little girl’s mom, who was hopefully having a much needed fun night out on Saturday.

Tug of War Over Children’s Healthcare

Hello Kittens – 

This post is also posted today by me on DC Metro Moms (www.dcmetromoms.com). I am cross-posting because I think this issue is so very important and hope everyone is paying attention……so here it goes….. 

Nary a day passes when I don’t wonder how this President of ours can wake up and actually face himself in the mirror. As if the death toll in Iraq and hiding of the dead soldiers in caskets when they return to the US isn’t enough but hey – how about the economy?

Or how Hurricane Katrina victims? Or wait – how about censorship of live television?

How DARE Emmy-award winner Sally Field question him on the War? http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jFeiXKwcMM-AgMVN1HZAPMkVleIg 

I mean, really, should I keep going?

OK good, because I will. Just when you think this man cannot damage himself any further, politically, he is doing it again. He is threatening to VETO the House and now Senate-passed bill to increase funding for state sponsored children’s health care.

You got it. He is AGAINST providing health insurance for more poor kids.

I mean – isn’t that like hating Santa and putting a bounty out for the head of the Easter bunny?

How very conservative of him. So in case you weren’t following, he is FOR spending a billion dollars a day in Iraq indefinitely, but he is AGAINST spending $2 billion more a year on covering uninsured poor children.

Of the 48 million uninsured Americans (shameful), 9 million of them are children. Earlier this week, the House passed legislation that would provide insurance for an additional 3.5 million children each year. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/25/AR2007092501474.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2007092502249

How is it that the man that has increased our budget every year for six years, thereby defying fiscal conservatism, is suddenly tightening the reigns and making poor uninsured kids the victims?

The Senate passed the bill last night, according to the Washington Post and the President has threatened to veto the bill.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/27/AR2007092701038.html?hpid=topnews

I could be wrong but by my estimation, this would mark only the THIRD time the President has vetoed a bill during his presidency. The first came in 2006 to veto federally funded stem cell research (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/20/washington/20bush.html) and the second came earlier this summer to veto a bill that would have forced a time line to bring the troops home from Iraq (http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/01/congress.iraq/index.html).

So what does this mean, exactly? It means that nothing in Washington is as it seems. It means that the White House is hiding behind rhetoric that they believe this expanded coverage would provide free health care to children in families that are not considered poor.

Whatever. Look – it is a disgrace that there are 48 million uninsured Americans and it is a disgrace that there are 9 million uninsured children in this country. If children do not have access to health care when they need it, how can we expect them to grow and develop into thriving, successful adults? What is the point of government and taxes if it isn’t there to protect those that need it most, like children?

How can a man who based two campaigns around morals and values threaten to veto increased spending for children’s health care?

The list of contradictions coming out of the Republican party never cease to amaze me but on this one, Bush is alone. I’m sure it’s going to pass the Senate and make its way to the President’s desk. And you can be sure my claws are out and will be sharpened on the day he vetoes it. 

Uninspired

Kittens –

I’ve just been uninspired lately. There’s really nothing going on and nothing has fired me up. These are good things. I seek out an uneventful, drama free life – but it means that I have nothing to rant about on KT. Boring, I know.

I haven’t even had any deep thoughts lately to share with you. Shocking, I know.

As for the world of celebrities and fashion, I’m even moderately bored there. We can wonder, is JLo preggo and if so, is she pregnant with twins? Her fashion choices lately certainly suggest she is pregnant.

http://perezhilton.com/?p=6143

How about Salma having a baby girl – who LOVES the name Valentina? Fabulous. Love it. Fabulous.

http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2007/09/salma-hayek-wel.html

Britney’s body guard actually became a heated discussion in my house the other night. We are really smart.

My husband questioned the body guard’s motives and why wouldn’t he reveal these things in private. My counter-point is that there is no way it would be kept private. Britney plays her life out on a public stage for us all to see therefore her divorce and custody battle is a public spectacle and so why would her body guard handle it any differently.

As to his motives – are they really as simple as he is concerned for the children? Is he getting paid? I guess I don’t really care. I predicted a while ago that one of these young Hollywood ladies would end up dead within five years (Britney, Lindsay, Paris, Nicole) and at this rate, it seems that it sadly might be Britney if she doesn’t get the help she needs:  http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20058350,00.html

And then there’s Jenny Garner. She’s all over the press now due to her movie “The Kingdom” and the new play she’s starring in with Kevin Kline. I love her. I consider her my celeb twin in that I think she is a mother much in the way I would be if I were a famous star and had gobs of money, I’d always be at the farmer’s market and park as well. I just like how much she talks about loving motherhood, how fabulous Violet is, how she kept weight on while breastfeeding, she just strikes me as so normal. And again, unlike ridiculous Katie Holmes, she is not dressed for a Vogue fashion shoot whenever we see her out and about with her daughter. For more on Jenny Garner:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297921,00.html

And then how about shoes. You know how I love me some shoes. Well, one of my dear friends sent me a link to some shoes on sale at Nordstrom, which then sucked up like an hour of my time as I perused all the shoes on sale. And I was left feeling in a quandary. I need new boots, we’ve covered that before, but there are so many fabulous summer shoes on sale for practically nothing.

http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/2958229/0~2376788~6002242~6007715~6007726?mediumthumbnail=Y&origin=category&searchtype=&pbo=6007726&P=3

So – instead of the boots, do I purchase a few pair of fab shoes for next summer at a great deal? I mean, I’m only thinking of my future self here.

And I am always faced with this dilemma. I LOVE starting a new season off with a pair of shoes in my closet that I’ve had tucked away for months and purchased for a great deal.

BUT – will metallic still be in in Summer 08?

How about espadrilles? I mean, if you are tracking the publicity shots of the S&TC girls shooting the movie, it might suggest that the shoes SJP is wearing in this shoot are going to be the summer look of 08:

http://popsugar.com/gallery/138423?page=0,0,18

Or these:

http://popsugar.com/gallery/137190?page=0,0,1

So what does a gal do? Shop now on discount for next summer or focus on this fall? I could purchase under the guise of timeless fashion pieces being added to my wardrobe? I think Tim Gunn would concur.

I’ll love you the most if you say “Do both!”

And finally, while I was looking for links to include, I stumbled up on this news on the disappearance of that little British girl Madeleine:

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20058636,00.html